2026 NRL player comparison

Rex BassingthwaitevsWill Warbrick

Roosters · Wing versus Storm · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Will Warbrick has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 71%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

3measures wonRex Bassingthwaite71%of decided measures18measures wonWill Warbrick

Games played: 9 for Rex Bassingthwaite, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRoosters logoRex BassingthwaiteStorm logoWill Warbrick
Tries per Game0.330.89Better
Try Assists per Game0.000.06Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.000.00
Points per Game1.33.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.110.61Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.223.00Better
Offloads per Game0.000.78Better
Possessions per Game4.019.7Better
Passes per Game0.41.6Better
Run Metres per Game25.4137.9Better
Metres Gained per Game25.4137.9Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game7.750.4Better
Runs per Game3.214.7Better
Metres per Run7.909.37Better
Metres per Hit-Up3.908.65Better
Tackles per Game2.05.4Better
Tackle Efficiency81.8Better78.9
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.11Better0.20
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.08Better0.09
Kick Returns per Game0.71.5Better
Kick Return Metres per Game6.018.3Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.11.6Better
Games played918