The verdict
Simi Sasagi has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Simi Sasagi leads by 71%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonPaul Alamoti71%of decided measures18measures wonSimi Sasagi
Games played: 21 for Paul Alamoti, 16 for Simi Sasagi. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Paul Alamoti |  Simi Sasagi |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.19 | 0.44Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14 | 0.75Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.33 | 0.69Better |
| Points per Game | 2.0Better | 1.8 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52 | 0.56Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.19 | 4.31Better |
| Offloads per Game | 1.29 | 1.31Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0 | 21.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.0 | 3.6Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 129.8 | 166.6Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 132.0 | 172.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 48.7 | 64.9Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.8 | 17.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.40 | 9.52Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.25 | 9.66Better |
| Tackles per Game | 13.0 | 15.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 78.9 | 81.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.22 | 0.16Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 86.7 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.01Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.5Better | 0.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 21 | 16 |