The verdict
Naufahu Whyte has the edge
Across 16 rate and efficiency measures, Naufahu Whyte leads by 50%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonNaufahu Whyte50%of decided measures4measures wonTevita Tatola
Games played: 23 for Naufahu Whyte, 24 for Tevita Tatola. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Naufahu Whyte |  Tevita Tatola |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.00 | 0.08Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.0 | 0.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.09Better | 0.04 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.87Better | 0.42 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.13Better | 0.04 |
| Possessions per Game | 17.8Better | 14.2 |
| Passes per Game | 1.7Better | 1.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 162.7Better | 106.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 162.7Better | 106.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 70.6Better | 39.4 |
| Runs per Game | 16.1Better | 12.8 |
| Metres per Run | 10.12Better | 8.35 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.37Better | 8.05 |
| Tackles per Game | 25.7 | 26.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 92.8Better | 91.6 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 23 | 24 |