The verdict
Will Warbrick has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonMoses Leo20%of decided measures12measures wonWill Warbrick
Games played: 17 for Moses Leo, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Moses Leo | Will Warbrick |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.65 | 0.89Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 2.6 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.00Better | 0.61 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.65Better | 3.00 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.12 | 0.78Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.4 | 19.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.2Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 123.3 | 137.9Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 125.4 | 137.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.8 | 50.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 11.4 | 14.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.86Better | 9.37 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.21Better | 8.65 |
| Tackles per Game | 6.4Better | 5.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 71.1 | 78.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.29 | 0.20Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.07Better | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.0 | 1.5Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 20.7Better | 18.3 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 1.6Better |
| Games played | 17 | 18 |