2026 NRL player comparison

Mitchell BarnettvsTrey Mooney

Warriors · Prop versus Knights · Prop

Compare another player

The verdict

Mitchell Barnett has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

12measures wonMitchell Barnett26%of decided measures7measures wonTrey Mooney

Games played: 15 for Mitchell Barnett, 22 for Trey Mooney. Compared positions: Prop.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoMitchell BarnettKnights logoTrey Mooney
Tries per Game0.070.23Better
Try Assists per Game0.20Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.13Better0.00
Points per Game0.30.9Better
Line Breaks per Game0.070.18Better
Tackle Breaks per Game1.87Better1.41
Offloads per Game0.531.00Better
Possessions per Game19.5Better14.3
Passes per Game2.7Better1.9
Run Metres per Game149.0Better100.5
Metres Gained per Game149.5Better101.2
Post-Contact Metres per Game52.7Better34.0
Runs per Game16.9Better11.9
Metres per Run8.83Better8.44
Metres per Hit-Up8.61Better8.15
Tackles per Game27.332.4Better
Tackle Efficiency90.590.9Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.060.05Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.04
Games played1522