2026 NRL player comparison

Mitchell BarnettvsSpencer Leniu

Warriors · Prop versus Roosters · Prop

Compare another player

The verdict

Mitchell Barnett has the edge

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 56%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

14measures wonMitchell Barnett56%of decided measures4measures wonSpencer Leniu

Games played: 15 for Mitchell Barnett, 20 for Spencer Leniu. Compared positions: Prop.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoMitchell BarnettRoosters logoSpencer Leniu
Tries per Game0.07Better0.00
Try Assists per Game0.20Better0.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.13Better0.00
Points per Game0.3Better0.0
Line Breaks per Game0.07Better0.00
Tackle Breaks per Game1.872.10Better
Offloads per Game0.53Better0.30
Possessions per Game19.5Better9.3
Passes per Game2.7Better0.8
Run Metres per Game149.0Better79.7
Metres Gained per Game149.5Better79.7
Post-Contact Metres per Game52.7Better32.3
Runs per Game16.9Better8.3
Metres per Run8.839.65Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.619.53Better
Tackles per Game27.3Better16.1
Tackle Efficiency90.591.7Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.060.06
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.01Better0.03
Games played1520