The verdict
Mitchell Barnett has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 89%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonMitchell Barnett89%of decided measures1measures wonSam Tuivaiti
Games played: 15 for Mitchell Barnett, 15 for Sam Tuivaiti. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Mitchell Barnett |  Sam Tuivaiti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.07Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.13Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.3Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.07Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.87Better | 0.53 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.53Better | 0.13 |
| Possessions per Game | 19.5Better | 10.1 |
| Passes per Game | 2.7Better | 0.2 |
| Run Metres per Game | 149.0Better | 75.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 149.5Better | 75.2 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.7Better | 25.4 |
| Runs per Game | 16.9Better | 9.7 |
| Metres per Run | 8.83Better | 7.78 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.61Better | 7.23 |
| Tackles per Game | 27.3Better | 23.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.5 | 91.0Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.03 |
| Games played | 15 | 15 |