The verdict
Payne Haas has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Payne Haas leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonMitchell Barnett22%of decided measures11measures wonPayne Haas
Games played: 15 for Mitchell Barnett, 17 for Payne Haas. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Mitchell Barnett |  Payne Haas |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.07 | 0.18Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.13Better | 0.06 |
| Points per Game | 0.3 | 0.7Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.07 | 0.24Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.87 | 4.47Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.53 | 1.53Better |
| Possessions per Game | 19.5Better | 16.6 |
| Passes per Game | 2.7Better | 2.1 |
| Run Metres per Game | 149.0Better | 146.5 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 149.5Better | 146.5 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 52.7 | 62.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 16.9Better | 14.8 |
| Metres per Run | 8.83 | 9.92Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.61 | 9.97Better |
| Tackles per Game | 27.3 | 37.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.5 | 95.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.02Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Games played | 15 | 17 |