The verdict
Zac Hosking has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Zac Hosking leads by 6%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonMax Plath6%of decided measures9measures wonZac Hosking
Games played: 19 for Max Plath, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Max Plath |  Zac Hosking |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.21 | 0.24Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 0.8 | 1.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.37Better | 0.19 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.16Better | 0.86 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 0.90Better |
| Possessions per Game | 56.9Better | 13.1 |
| Passes per Game | 48.3Better | 1.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 79.8 | 89.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 79.8 | 89.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 30.6 | 31.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.2 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.71Better | 8.17 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.34Better | 8.53 |
| Tackles per Game | 33.9Better | 33.2 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.0 | 93.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.02 |
| Games played | 19 | 21 |