The verdict
Matt Burton has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Matt Burton leads by 20%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonMatt Burton20%of decided measures8measures wonWill Penisini
Games played: 23 for Matt Burton, 12 for Will Penisini. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Matt Burton |  Will Penisini |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.39Better | 0.33 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.35Better | 0.17 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.61Better | 0.42 |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 1.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.57Better | 0.33 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.96 | 3.50Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.61 | 1.00Better |
| Possessions per Game | 36.7Better | 17.2 |
| Passes per Game | 19.2Better | 2.4 |
| Run Metres per Game | 122.3 | 141.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 310.9Better | 141.3 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.3 | 54.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.0 | 14.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.44 | 9.75Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.44 | 9.34Better |
| Tackles per Game | 16.0Better | 12.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 81.4Better | 80.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 79.2 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 23 | 12 |