The verdict
Simi Sasagi has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Simi Sasagi leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonMatt Burton33%of decided measures14measures wonSimi Sasagi
Games played: 23 for Matt Burton, 16 for Simi Sasagi. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Matt Burton |  Simi Sasagi |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.39 | 0.44Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.35 | 0.75Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.61 | 0.69Better |
| Points per Game | 3.6Better | 1.8 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.57Better | 0.56 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.96 | 4.31Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.61 | 1.31Better |
| Possessions per Game | 36.7Better | 21.0 |
| Passes per Game | 19.2Better | 3.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 122.3 | 166.6Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 310.9Better | 172.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.3 | 64.9Better |
| Runs per Game | 13.0 | 17.5Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.44 | 9.52Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.44 | 9.66Better |
| Tackles per Game | 16.0Better | 15.6 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 81.4 | 81.9Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.15Better | 0.16 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 79.2 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 100.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.01Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.1Better |
| Games played | 23 | 16 |