The verdict
Niwhai Puru has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Niwhai Puru leads by 67%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonLuke Metcalf67%of decided measures15measures wonNiwhai Puru
Games played: 10 for Luke Metcalf, 6 for Niwhai Puru. Compared positions: Halfback.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Luke Metcalf |  Niwhai Puru |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.20Better | 0.17 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.20Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.10 | 0.17Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.00 | 0.17Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.5 | 48.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 8.8 | 34.8Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 19.3 | 41.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 113.1 | 334.7Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 4.7 | 11.2Better |
| Runs per Game | 2.1 | 5.2Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.19Better | 8.00 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | – | – |
| Tackles per Game | 5.8 | 30.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6 | 86.8Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10 | 0.09Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | 75.0 | 100.0Better |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Kicks per Game | 2.8 | 8.2Better |
| Kick Metres per Game | 94.0 | 293.0Better |
| Games played | 10 | 6 |