2026 NRL player comparison

Luke Laulili'ivsMark Nawaqanitawase

Warriors · Wing versus Roosters · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Mark Nawaqanitawase has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Mark Nawaqanitawase leads by 82%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

2measures wonLuke Laulili'i82%of decided measures20measures wonMark Nawaqanitawase

Games played: 12 for Luke Laulili'i, 19 for Mark Nawaqanitawase. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoLuke Laulili'iRoosters logoMark Nawaqanitawase
Tries per Game0.500.79Better
Try Assists per Game0.170.32Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.080.32Better
Points per Game2.03.2Better
Line Breaks per Game0.580.74Better
Tackle Breaks per Game2.003.21Better
Offloads per Game0.421.21Better
Possessions per Game15.121.6Better
Passes per Game2.02.5Better
Run Metres per Game109.2157.8Better
Metres Gained per Game110.8162.2Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game33.460.8Better
Runs per Game12.116.4Better
Metres per Run9.039.61Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.26Better7.72
Tackles per Game2.84.6Better
Tackle Efficiency75.684.5Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.290.14Better
Conversion Accuracy0.0–
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.06Better0.11
Kick Returns per Game1.43.1Better
Kick Return Metres per Game14.034.9Better
Bombs Caught per Game0.41.3Better
Games played1219