The verdict
Paul Alamoti has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Paul Alamoti leads by 50%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonLeka Halasima50%of decided measures15measures wonPaul Alamoti
Games played: 20 for Leka Halasima, 21 for Paul Alamoti. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Leka Halasima |  Paul Alamoti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.40Better | 0.19 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.14Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.33Better |
| Points per Game | 1.6 | 2.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.35 | 0.52Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.60Better | 3.19 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20 | 1.29Better |
| Possessions per Game | 11.9 | 17.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.3 | 3.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.8 | 129.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 90.8 | 132.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.7 | 48.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.8 | 13.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.31 | 9.40Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.82 | 9.25Better |
| Tackles per Game | 18.1Better | 13.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.4Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16Better | 0.22 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 86.7 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.06Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Games played | 20 | 21 |