The verdict
Leka Halasima has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Leka Halasima leads by 30%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonLeka Halasima30%of decided measures7measures wonLuke Garner
Games played: 20 for Leka Halasima, 18 for Luke Garner. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Leka Halasima |  Luke Garner |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.40Better | 0.17 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.06 |
| Points per Game | 1.6Better | 0.7 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.35Better | 0.22 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.60Better | 1.28 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20 | 0.28Better |
| Possessions per Game | 11.9Better | 8.9 |
| Passes per Game | 1.3 | 1.4Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.8Better | 65.6 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 90.8Better | 67.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.7Better | 26.6 |
| Runs per Game | 9.8Better | 7.3 |
| Metres per Run | 9.31Better | 9.02 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.82 | 9.41Better |
| Tackles per Game | 18.1 | 20.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.4 | 89.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.03Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.2Better | 0.1 |
| Games played | 20 | 18 |