The verdict
Latrell Mitchell has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Latrell Mitchell leads by 40%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
14measures wonLatrell Mitchell40%of decided measures6measures wonRobert Toia
Games played: 11 for Latrell Mitchell, 20 for Robert Toia. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Latrell Mitchell |  Robert Toia |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 1.09Better | 0.60 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.82Better | 0.60 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 1.64Better | 0.40 |
| Points per Game | 12.0Better | 2.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 1.00Better | 0.70 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 4.00 | 4.25Better |
| Offloads per Game | 2.27Better | 0.60 |
| Possessions per Game | 26.6Better | 16.7 |
| Passes per Game | 10.9Better | 5.3 |
| Run Metres per Game | 110.4Better | 104.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 285.5Better | 104.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 38.2 | 43.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.3 | 10.8Better |
| Metres per Run | 10.74Better | 9.66 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.76Better | 8.07 |
| Tackles per Game | 8.5 | 20.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 84.5Better | 83.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Conversion Accuracy | 61.7 | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | 80.0 | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.05Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 11 | 20 |