The verdict
Liam Martin has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Liam Martin leads by 44%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonKurt Capewell44%of decided measures13measures wonLiam Martin
Games played: 13 for Kurt Capewell, 16 for Liam Martin. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Kurt Capewell |  Liam Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.15 | 0.44Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.23Better | 0.13 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.25Better |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 1.8Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.23 | 0.44Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.00 | 1.94Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.62 | 1.06Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.0 | 13.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.0Better | 2.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 76.2 | 82.2Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 80.5 | 82.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 29.2 | 29.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.2 | 10.4Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.32Better | 7.92 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.67Better | 7.82 |
| Tackles per Game | 29.8 | 29.8 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.6 | 87.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.08 |
| Games played | 13 | 16 |