The verdict
Leo Thompson has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Leo Thompson leads by 6%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonJosh King6%of decided measures9measures wonLeo Thompson
Games played: 24 for Josh King, 19 for Leo Thompson. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Josh King |  Leo Thompson |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.08Better | 0.00 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.3Better | 0.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.08Better | 0.00 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.71 | 1.47Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.58 | 0.95Better |
| Possessions per Game | 12.3 | 14.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.2 | 2.0Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 90.2 | 100.3Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 91.8 | 100.3Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 31.5 | 36.0Better |
| Runs per Game | 10.6 | 12.0Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.49Better | 8.36 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.27Better | 8.10 |
| Tackles per Game | 32.3 | 36.3Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.1Better | 90.2 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.07 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02Better | 0.04 |
| Games played | 24 | 19 |