The verdict
Mawene Hiroti has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Mawene Hiroti leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
9measures wonJosh Feledy14%of decided measures12measures wonMawene Hiroti
Games played: 18 for Josh Feledy, 19 for Mawene Hiroti. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Josh Feledy |  Mawene Hiroti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.28Better | 0.11 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.11Better | 0.05 |
| Points per Game | 1.1Better | 0.5 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.22Better | 0.16 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.06 | 1.21Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.11Better | 0.05 |
| Possessions per Game | 7.3 | 8.9Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.9Better | 0.5 |
| Run Metres per Game | 43.8 | 69.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 45.0 | 69.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 16.0 | 24.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 5.3 | 7.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.22 | 8.93Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.00 | 9.09Better |
| Tackles per Game | 6.0 | 9.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 83.1 | 84.7Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.15 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.1Better |
| Games played | 18 | 19 |