2026 NRL player comparison

Josh Addo-CarrvsWill Warbrick

Eels · Wing versus Storm · Wing

Compare another player

The verdict

Will Warbrick has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Will Warbrick leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

7measures wonJosh Addo-Carr26%of decided measures12measures wonWill Warbrick

Games played: 23 for Josh Addo-Carr, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricEels logoJosh Addo-CarrStorm logoWill Warbrick
Tries per Game0.350.89Better
Try Assists per Game0.040.06Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.000.00
Points per Game1.43.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.610.61
Tackle Breaks per Game3.65Better3.00
Offloads per Game0.130.78Better
Possessions per Game16.019.7Better
Passes per Game2.6Better1.6
Run Metres per Game123.3137.9Better
Metres Gained per Game126.6137.9Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game43.850.4Better
Runs per Game11.914.7Better
Metres per Run10.39Better9.37
Metres per Hit-Up7.768.65Better
Tackles per Game5.45.4
Tackle Efficiency78.578.9Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.19Better0.20
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.05Better0.09
Kick Returns per Game2.6Better1.5
Kick Return Metres per Game27.9Better18.3
Bombs Caught per Game0.71.6Better
Games played2318