2026 NRL player comparison

Joseph TapinevsToby Couchman

Raiders · Prop versus Dragons · Prop

Compare another player

The verdict

Too close to call

Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

9measures wonJoseph Tapine0%of decided measures9measures wonToby Couchman

Games played: 24 for Joseph Tapine, 22 for Toby Couchman. Compared positions: Prop.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRaiders logoJoseph TapineDragons logoToby Couchman
Tries per Game0.04Better0.00
Try Assists per Game0.000.05Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.08Better0.05
Points per Game0.2Better0.0
Line Breaks per Game0.04Better0.00
Tackle Breaks per Game2.13Better1.23
Offloads per Game1.75Better1.00
Possessions per Game18.3Better15.7
Passes per Game3.9Better1.1
Run Metres per Game130.4132.4Better
Metres Gained per Game130.4132.4Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game49.349.3
Runs per Game15.0Better14.4
Metres per Run8.729.19Better
Metres per Hit-Up8.889.34Better
Tackles per Game31.440.5Better
Tackle Efficiency91.595.1Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.060.03Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.01Better
Games played2422