The verdict
Mitchell Barnett has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 33%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
6measures wonJoseph Tapine33%of decided measures12measures wonMitchell Barnett
Games played: 24 for Joseph Tapine, 15 for Mitchell Barnett. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Joseph Tapine |  Mitchell Barnett |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04 | 0.07Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.20Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.08 | 0.13Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.07Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.13Better | 1.87 |
| Offloads per Game | 1.75Better | 0.53 |
| Possessions per Game | 18.3 | 19.5Better |
| Passes per Game | 3.9Better | 2.7 |
| Run Metres per Game | 130.4 | 149.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 130.4 | 149.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 49.3 | 52.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 15.0 | 16.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.72 | 8.83Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.88Better | 8.61 |
| Tackles per Game | 31.4Better | 27.3 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.5Better | 90.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.01Better |
| Games played | 24 | 15 |