2026 NRL player comparison

John RadelvsMitchell Barnett

Rabbitohs · Prop versus Warriors · Prop

Compare another player

The verdict

Mitchell Barnett has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

5measures wonJohn Radel47%of decided measures14measures wonMitchell Barnett

Games played: 7 for John Radel, 15 for Mitchell Barnett. Compared positions: Prop.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRabbitohs logoJohn RadelWarriors logoMitchell Barnett
Tries per Game0.29Better0.07
Try Assists per Game0.000.20Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.000.13Better
Points per Game1.1Better0.3
Line Breaks per Game0.14Better0.07
Tackle Breaks per Game0.431.87Better
Offloads per Game0.000.53Better
Possessions per Game5.019.5Better
Passes per Game0.12.7Better
Run Metres per Game43.1149.0Better
Metres Gained per Game43.1149.5Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game13.452.7Better
Runs per Game4.916.9Better
Metres per Run8.88Better8.83
Metres per Hit-Up6.308.61Better
Tackles per Game12.627.3Better
Tackle Efficiency89.890.5Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.02Better0.06
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.030.01Better
Games played715