The verdict
Zac Hosking has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Zac Hosking leads by 58%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonJohn Bateman58%of decided measures15measures wonZac Hosking
Games played: 7 for John Bateman, 21 for Zac Hosking. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  John Bateman |  Zac Hosking |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14 | 0.24Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14Better | 0.05 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 1.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.29Better | 0.19 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.57 | 0.86Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.43 | 0.90Better |
| Possessions per Game | 7.4 | 13.1Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.9 | 1.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 54.3 | 89.1Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 55.7 | 89.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 17.7 | 31.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.1 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.84Better | 8.17 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.94Better | 8.53 |
| Tackles per Game | 17.6 | 33.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.4 | 93.3Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.04Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 7 | 21 |