The verdict
Tyson Frizell has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Tyson Frizell leads by 58%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonJohn Bateman58%of decided measures15measures wonTyson Frizell
Games played: 7 for John Bateman, 21 for Tyson Frizell. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  John Bateman |  Tyson Frizell |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.29Better | 0.05 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.57 | 0.76Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.43 | 0.81Better |
| Possessions per Game | 7.4 | 11.2Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.9 | 2.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 54.3 | 80.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 55.7 | 81.1Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 17.7 | 31.1Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.1 | 8.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.84 | 9.04Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.94 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 17.6 | 24.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.4 | 93.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.05Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04 | 0.02Better |
| Games played | 7 | 21 |