The verdict
Noah Martin has the edge
Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Noah Martin leads by 41%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonJohn Bateman41%of decided measures12measures wonNoah Martin
Games played: 7 for John Bateman, 11 for Noah Martin. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  John Bateman |  Noah Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14 | 0.36Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.14Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.6 | 1.5Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.29 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.57 | 2.18Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.43Better | 0.18 |
| Possessions per Game | 7.4 | 10.6Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.9 | 2.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 54.3 | 70.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 55.7 | 70.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 17.7 | 26.8Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.1 | 8.1Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.84Better | 8.65 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.94Better | 7.80 |
| Tackles per Game | 17.6 | 39.6Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.4 | 90.6Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.04Better | 0.06 |
| Games played | 7 | 11 |