The verdict
Jethro Rinakama has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jethro Rinakama leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
13measures wonJethro Rinakama24%of decided measures8measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 15 for Jethro Rinakama, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jethro Rinakama |  Tevita Naufahu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.47Better | 0.23 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.08Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.9Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.73 | 0.77Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.67 | 3.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.33Better | 0.08 |
| Possessions per Game | 14.5Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 1.1 | 1.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 110.7Better | 108.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 110.7 | 112.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 37.3Better | 34.0 |
| Runs per Game | 12.0Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 9.23 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.48 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 3.6Better | 2.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 87.1Better | 79.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11Better | 0.19 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.10 | 0.05Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.7Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 19.1Better | 13.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.0Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 15 | 13 |