The verdict
Jermaine McEwen has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jermaine McEwen leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonJermaine McEwen26%of decided measures7measures wonSione Fainu
Games played: 20 for Jermaine McEwen, 23 for Sione Fainu. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.10Better | 0.09 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.4Better | 0.3 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.30Better | 0.04 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.75Better | 0.74 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.20 | 0.26Better |
| Possessions per Game | 14.4Better | 11.3 |
| Passes per Game | 2.3 | 2.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 94.5Better | 73.7 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 97.9Better | 73.7 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 33.9Better | 30.1 |
| Runs per Game | 11.6Better | 8.3 |
| Metres per Run | 8.18 | 8.83Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.30 | 8.78Better |
| Tackles per Game | 33.8Better | 24.7 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.3 | 89.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.09 | 0.08Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.03Better |
| Games played | 20 | 23 |