The verdict
Kulikefu Finefeuiaki has the edge
Across 18 rate and efficiency measures, Kulikefu Finefeuiaki leads by 22%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
7measures wonJeremiah Nanai22%of decided measures11measures wonKulikefu Finefeuiaki
Games played: 9 for Jeremiah Nanai, 22 for Kulikefu Finefeuiaki. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jeremiah Nanai |  Kulikefu Finefeuiaki |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.44Better | 0.14 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.05Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.8Better | 0.5 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.33Better | 0.23 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.11 | 2.41Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.33Better | 0.14 |
| Possessions per Game | 10.9 | 15.8Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.8Better | 0.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 98.8 | 139.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 98.8 | 139.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.7 | 58.0Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.9 | 14.7Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.99Better | 9.47 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.97Better | 9.32 |
| Tackles per Game | 27.1 | 35.4Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.0 | 90.2Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.06Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.04Better |
| Games played | 9 | 22 |