The verdict
Jeremiah Nanai has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Jeremiah Nanai leads by 26%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonJeremiah Nanai26%of decided measures7measures wonJermaine McEwen
Games played: 9 for Jeremiah Nanai, 20 for Jermaine McEwen. Compared positions: Second Row.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jeremiah Nanai |  Jermaine McEwen |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.44Better | 0.10 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.15Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.10Better |
| Points per Game | 1.8Better | 0.4 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.33Better | 0.30 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.11Better | 1.75 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.33Better | 0.20 |
| Possessions per Game | 10.9 | 14.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 0.8 | 2.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 98.8Better | 94.5 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 98.8Better | 97.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 42.7Better | 33.9 |
| Runs per Game | 9.9 | 11.6Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.99Better | 8.18 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.97Better | 8.30 |
| Tackles per Game | 27.1 | 33.8Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.0Better | 89.3 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08Better | 0.09 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.05Better |
| Games played | 9 | 20 |