2026 NRL player comparison

Jaylan De GrootvsLeka Halasima

Titans · Centre versus Warriors · Centre

Compare another player

The verdict

Leka Halasima has the edge

Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Leka Halasima leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

5measures wonJaylan De Groot52%of decided measures16measures wonLeka Halasima

Games played: 17 for Jaylan De Groot, 20 for Leka Halasima. Compared positions: Centre.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricTitans logoJaylan De GrootWarriors logoLeka Halasima
Tries per Game0.120.40Better
Try Assists per Game0.060.10Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.120.15Better
Points per Game0.51.6Better
Line Breaks per Game0.060.35Better
Tackle Breaks per Game0.533.60Better
Offloads per Game0.24Better0.20
Possessions per Game8.511.9Better
Passes per Game3.4Better1.3
Run Metres per Game44.090.8Better
Metres Gained per Game44.990.8Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game13.137.7Better
Runs per Game4.69.8Better
Metres per Run9.47Better9.31
Metres per Hit-Up7.318.82Better
Tackles per Game5.118.1Better
Tackle Efficiency80.683.4Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.210.16Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.03Better0.08
Kick Returns per Game0.3Better0.2
Bombs Caught per Game0.10.2Better
Games played1720