2026 NRL player comparison

James TedescovsWilliam Kennedy

Roosters · Fullback versus Sharks · Fullback

Compare another player

The verdict

James Tedesco has the edge

Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, James Tedesco leads by 36%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

15measures wonJames Tedesco36%of decided measures7measures wonWilliam Kennedy

Games played: 17 for James Tedesco, 24 for William Kennedy. Compared positions: Fullback.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricRoosters logoJames TedescoSharks logoWilliam Kennedy
Tries per Game0.65Better0.42
Try Assists per Game0.82Better0.71
Line Break Assists per Game0.530.75Better
Points per Game2.6Better1.7
Line Breaks per Game0.88Better0.46
Tackle Breaks per Game3.82Better2.75
Offloads per Game1.59Better0.17
Possessions per Game35.1Better27.5
Passes per Game17.6Better12.3
Run Metres per Game192.2Better147.8
Metres Gained per Game201.7Better150.5
Post-Contact Metres per Game52.9Better38.3
Runs per Game19.0Better14.5
Metres per Run10.1210.19Better
Metres per Hit-Up7.0010.54Better
Tackles per Game3.35.5Better
Tackle Efficiency76.7Better71.2
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.23Better0.34
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.02Better0.03
Kick Returns per Game4.66.6Better
Kick Return Metres per Game50.575.9Better
Bombs Caught per Game1.22.2Better
Games played1724