The verdict
James Fisher-Harris has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, James Fisher-Harris leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonJames Fisher-Harris16%of decided measures8measures wonJoseph Tapine
Games played: 21 for James Fisher-Harris, 24 for Joseph Tapine. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  James Fisher-Harris |  Joseph Tapine |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.14Better | 0.04 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.05Better | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.08 |
| Points per Game | 0.6Better | 0.2 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.14Better | 0.04 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.24 | 2.13Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.62 | 1.75Better |
| Possessions per Game | 19.2Better | 18.3 |
| Passes per Game | 3.4 | 3.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 135.9Better | 130.4 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 135.9Better | 130.4 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 45.3 | 49.3Better |
| Runs per Game | 16.2Better | 15.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.37 | 8.72Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.81 | 8.88Better |
| Tackles per Game | 32.0Better | 31.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 90.3 | 91.5Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.08 | 0.06Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.01Better | 0.02 |
| Games played | 21 | 24 |