2026 NRL player comparison

Jake AverillovsStephen Crichton

Dolphins · Five-Eighth versus Bulldogs · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Too close to call

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

10measures wonJake Averillo0%of decided measures10measures wonStephen Crichton

Games played: 11 for Jake Averillo, 20 for Stephen Crichton. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricDolphins logoJake AverilloBulldogs logoStephen Crichton
Tries per Game0.55Better0.35
Try Assists per Game0.450.45
Line Break Assists per Game0.360.55Better
Points per Game2.26.7Better
Line Breaks per Game0.64Better0.45
Tackle Breaks per Game1.82Better1.80
Offloads per Game0.640.95Better
Possessions per Game20.430.5Better
Passes per Game8.816.0Better
Run Metres per Game131.1Better89.3
Metres Gained per Game140.4259.9Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game43.1Better33.5
Runs per Game12.1Better8.7
Metres per Run10.84Better10.26
Metres per Hit-Up8.5710.85Better
Tackles per Game11.113.2Better
Tackle Efficiency86.5Better78.7
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.11Better0.18
Conversion Accuracy–73.7
Penalty Goal Accuracy–100.0
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.03Better0.04
Kicks per Game0.54.8Better
Kick Metres per Game9.4170.6Better
Games played1120