The verdict
Too close to call
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
10measures wonJake Averillo0%of decided measures10measures wonJake Clifford
Games played: 11 for Jake Averillo, 24 for Jake Clifford. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jake Averillo |  Jake Clifford |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.55Better | 0.38 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.45 | 0.58Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.36 | 0.50Better |
| Points per Game | 2.2 | 6.0Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.64Better | 0.46 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.82Better | 1.79 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.64 | 0.75Better |
| Possessions per Game | 20.4 | 36.3Better |
| Passes per Game | 8.8 | 21.5Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 131.1Better | 55.0 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 140.4 | 403.2Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 43.1Better | 18.3 |
| Runs per Game | 12.1Better | 6.5 |
| Metres per Run | 10.84Better | 8.41 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.57Better | 4.00 |
| Tackles per Game | 11.1 | 15.2Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.5Better | 82.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11Better | 0.15 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 65.8 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Kicks per Game | 0.5 | 8.3Better |
| Kick Metres per Game | 9.4 | 348.0Better |
| Games played | 11 | 24 |