The verdict
Jacob Kiraz has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Jacob Kiraz leads by 70%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
17measures wonJacob Kiraz70%of decided measures3measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 20 for Jacob Kiraz, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jacob Kiraz |  Tevita Naufahu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.45Better | 0.23 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.08 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.25Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.8Better | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.45 | 0.77Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.85Better | 3.38 |
| Offloads per Game | 2.95Better | 0.08 |
| Possessions per Game | 23.7Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 4.3Better | 1.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 167.2Better | 108.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 172.8Better | 112.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 53.2Better | 34.0 |
| Runs per Game | 19.1Better | 10.9 |
| Metres per Run | 8.75 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.92 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 5.6Better | 2.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.9Better | 79.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.19 | 0.19 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 3.3Better | 1.5 |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 30.6Better | 13.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.1Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 20 | 13 |