2026 NRL player comparison

Jackson FordvsNaufahu Whyte

Warriors · Prop versus Roosters · Prop

Compare another player

The verdict

Naufahu Whyte has the edge

Across 17 rate and efficiency measures, Naufahu Whyte leads by 29%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

6measures wonJackson Ford29%of decided measures11measures wonNaufahu Whyte

Games played: 14 for Jackson Ford, 23 for Naufahu Whyte. Compared positions: Prop.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricWarriors logoJackson FordRoosters logoNaufahu Whyte
Tries per Game0.29Better0.00
Try Assists per Game0.000.00
Line Break Assists per Game0.000.00
Points per Game1.3Better0.0
Line Breaks per Game0.43Better0.09
Tackle Breaks per Game2.292.87Better
Offloads per Game0.641.13Better
Possessions per Game19.0Better17.8
Passes per Game1.11.7Better
Run Metres per Game153.9162.7Better
Metres Gained per Game154.1162.7Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game63.570.6Better
Runs per Game17.5Better16.1
Metres per Run8.7910.12Better
Metres per Hit-Up9.1110.37Better
Tackles per Game43.6Better25.7
Tackle Efficiency90.192.8Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.080.05Better
Conversion Accuracy100.0–
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.030.02Better
Games played1423