The verdict
Matt Burton has the edge
Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Matt Burton leads by 50%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonJack Howarth50%of decided measures15measures wonMatt Burton
Games played: 17 for Jack Howarth, 23 for Matt Burton. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Howarth |  Matt Burton |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.35 | 0.39Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.18 | 0.35Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.29 | 0.61Better |
| Points per Game | 1.4 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.29 | 0.57Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 3.59Better | 2.96 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.59 | 0.61Better |
| Possessions per Game | 17.0 | 36.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.0 | 19.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 126.4Better | 122.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 128.4 | 310.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 44.6Better | 42.3 |
| Runs per Game | 14.9Better | 13.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.49 | 9.44Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.28Better | 7.44 |
| Tackles per Game | 11.6 | 16.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2 | 81.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.16 | 0.15Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 79.2 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.03 | 0.02Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Games played | 17 | 23 |