The verdict
Jack Bostock has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Bostock leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonJack Bostock14%of decided measures9measures wonMatt Burton
Games played: 14 for Jack Bostock, 23 for Matt Burton. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Jack Bostock |  Matt Burton |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.36 | 0.39Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.79Better | 0.35 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.79Better | 0.61 |
| Points per Game | 1.4 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.36 | 0.57Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.57 | 2.96Better |
| Offloads per Game | 1.07Better | 0.61 |
| Possessions per Game | 24.0 | 36.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 5.3 | 19.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 144.5Better | 122.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 148.9 | 310.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 46.4Better | 42.3 |
| Runs per Game | 17.3Better | 13.0 |
| Metres per Run | 8.36 | 9.44Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.38Better | 7.44 |
| Tackles per Game | 16.7Better | 16.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 84.8Better | 81.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.10Better | 0.15 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 79.2 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.08 | 0.02Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.3Better | 0.2 |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 1.0Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 14 | 23 |