The verdict
Jack Bostock has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Jack Bostock leads by 71%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
3measures wonIzack Tago71%of decided measures18measures wonJack Bostock
Games played: 23 for Izack Tago, 14 for Jack Bostock. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Izack Tago |  Jack Bostock |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.13 | 0.36Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.13 | 0.79Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.22 | 0.79Better |
| Points per Game | 0.5 | 1.4Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.13 | 0.36Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.48 | 2.57Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.43 | 1.07Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.8 | 24.0Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.9 | 5.3Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 60.9 | 144.5Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 62.3 | 148.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 21.0 | 46.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.7 | 17.3Better |
| Metres per Run | 9.09Better | 8.36 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.21 | 8.38Better |
| Tackles per Game | 10.0 | 16.7Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 86.8Better | 84.8 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.11 | 0.10Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.08 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.1 | 1.0Better |
| Games played | 23 | 14 |