The verdict
Herbie Farnworth has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Herbie Farnworth leads by 89%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
18measures wonHerbie Farnworth89%of decided measures1measures wonPaul Alamoti
Games played: 23 for Herbie Farnworth, 21 for Paul Alamoti. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Herbie Farnworth |  Paul Alamoti |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.57Better | 0.19 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.30Better | 0.14 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.70Better | 0.33 |
| Points per Game | 2.3Better | 2.0 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52 | 0.52 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 5.87Better | 3.19 |
| Offloads per Game | 3.30Better | 1.29 |
| Possessions per Game | 22.4Better | 17.0 |
| Passes per Game | 5.1Better | 3.0 |
| Run Metres per Game | 162.3Better | 129.8 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 167.8Better | 132.0 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 63.7Better | 48.7 |
| Runs per Game | 17.0Better | 13.8 |
| Metres per Run | 9.54Better | 9.40 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.17Better | 9.25 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.4Better | 13.0 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.8Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.22 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 86.7 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.5Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 23 | 21 |