The verdict
Herbie Farnworth has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Herbie Farnworth leads by 14%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
12measures wonHerbie Farnworth14%of decided measures9measures wonMatt Burton
Games played: 23 for Herbie Farnworth, 23 for Matt Burton. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Herbie Farnworth |  Matt Burton |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.57Better | 0.39 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.30 | 0.35Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.70Better | 0.61 |
| Points per Game | 2.3 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52 | 0.57Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 5.87Better | 2.96 |
| Offloads per Game | 3.30Better | 0.61 |
| Possessions per Game | 22.4 | 36.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 5.1 | 19.2Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 162.3Better | 122.3 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 167.8 | 310.9Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 63.7Better | 42.3 |
| Runs per Game | 17.0Better | 13.0 |
| Metres per Run | 9.54Better | 9.44 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.17Better | 7.44 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.4 | 16.0Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.8Better | 81.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.15 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | 79.2 |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | 100.0 |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.02Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.0 |
| Games played | 23 | 23 |