The verdict
Herbie Farnworth has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Herbie Farnworth leads by 52%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
16measures wonHerbie Farnworth52%of decided measures5measures wonJojo Fifita
Games played: 23 for Herbie Farnworth, 20 for Jojo Fifita. Compared positions: Centre.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Herbie Farnworth |  Jojo Fifita |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.57Better | 0.40 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.30Better | 0.20 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.70Better | 0.10 |
| Points per Game | 2.3Better | 1.6 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.52 | 0.55Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 5.87Better | 2.55 |
| Offloads per Game | 3.30Better | 0.75 |
| Possessions per Game | 22.4Better | 16.8 |
| Passes per Game | 5.1Better | 4.8 |
| Run Metres per Game | 162.3Better | 108.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 167.8Better | 110.6 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 63.7Better | 40.3 |
| Runs per Game | 17.0Better | 10.7 |
| Metres per Run | 9.54 | 10.15Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 10.17Better | 8.41 |
| Tackles per Game | 15.4 | 17.9Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 89.8Better | 85.4 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.06Better | 0.11 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.06 | 0.04Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 0.1 | 0.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.4Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 23 | 20 |