The verdict
Tevita Naufahu has the edge
Across 21 rate and efficiency measures, Tevita Naufahu leads by 24%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
8measures wonGrant Anderson24%of decided measures13measures wonTevita Naufahu
Games played: 17 for Grant Anderson, 13 for Tevita Naufahu. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Grant Anderson |  Tevita Naufahu |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.24Better | 0.23 |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.12Better | 0.08 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.29Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.35 | 0.77Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.06 | 3.38Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.29Better | 0.08 |
| Possessions per Game | 13.7Better | 13.0 |
| Passes per Game | 3.4Better | 1.9 |
| Run Metres per Game | 78.0 | 108.8Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 81.9 | 112.8Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 25.3 | 34.0Better |
| Runs per Game | 9.4 | 10.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.34 | 9.96Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.44 | 9.48Better |
| Tackles per Game | 4.7Better | 2.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 79.2 | 79.4Better |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.21 | 0.19Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.07 | 0.05Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.0 | 1.5Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 6.8 | 13.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.6Better | 0.2 |
| Games played | 17 | 13 |