The verdict
Fonua Pole has the edge
Across 16 rate and efficiency measures, Fonua Pole leads by 25%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
10measures wonFonua Pole25%of decided measures6measures wonJosh King
Games played: 24 for Fonua Pole, 24 for Josh King. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Fonua Pole |  Josh King |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.04 | 0.08Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.04 | 0.08Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 1.92Better | 0.71 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.04 | 0.58Better |
| Possessions per Game | 13.4Better | 12.3 |
| Passes per Game | 1.5Better | 1.2 |
| Run Metres per Game | 112.0Better | 90.2 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 112.0Better | 91.8 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 44.3Better | 31.5 |
| Runs per Game | 11.8Better | 10.6 |
| Metres per Run | 9.54Better | 8.49 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 9.36Better | 8.27 |
| Tackles per Game | 26.2 | 32.3Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 91.9Better | 91.1 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.07 | 0.06Better |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Games played | 24 | 24 |