2026 NRL player comparison

Fletcher SharpevsLuke Hanson

Knights · Five-Eighth versus Warriors · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Fletcher Sharpe has the edge

Across 20 rate and efficiency measures, Fletcher Sharpe leads by 70%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

17measures wonFletcher Sharpe70%of decided measures3measures wonLuke Hanson

Games played: 22 for Fletcher Sharpe, 7 for Luke Hanson. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricKnights logoFletcher SharpeWarriors logoLuke Hanson
Tries per Game0.55Better0.14
Try Assists per Game0.50Better0.29
Line Break Assists per Game0.73Better0.43
Points per Game2.2Better0.7
Line Breaks per Game0.59Better0.00
Tackle Breaks per Game3.18Better0.71
Offloads per Game0.68Better0.00
Possessions per Game40.9Better12.6
Passes per Game29.0Better9.7
Run Metres per Game105.6Better16.4
Metres Gained per Game140.4Better35.9
Post-Contact Metres per Game35.6Better5.3
Runs per Game10.5Better2.3
Metres per Run10.10Better7.19
Metres per Hit-Up7.50–
Tackles per Game17.5Better8.4
Tackle Efficiency86.386.8Better
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.090.03Better
Conversion Accuracy––
Penalty Goal Accuracy––
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.01Better
Kicks per Game1.3Better0.7
Kick Metres per Game34.8Better19.4
Games played227