2026 NRL player comparison

Fletcher SharpevsLuke Brooks

Knights · Five-Eighth versus Sea Eagles · Five-Eighth

Compare another player

The verdict

Fletcher Sharpe has the edge

Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Fletcher Sharpe leads by 16%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.

11measures wonFletcher Sharpe16%of decided measures8measures wonLuke Brooks

Games played: 22 for Fletcher Sharpe, 15 for Luke Brooks. Compared positions: Five-Eighth.

Side-by-side stats

Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.

MetricKnights logoFletcher SharpeSea Eagles logoLuke Brooks
Tries per Game0.55Better0.13
Try Assists per Game0.500.53Better
Line Break Assists per Game0.730.80Better
Points per Game2.2Better0.5
Line Breaks per Game0.59Better0.20
Tackle Breaks per Game3.18Better1.20
Offloads per Game0.68Better0.53
Possessions per Game40.956.4Better
Passes per Game29.044.1Better
Run Metres per Game105.6Better73.7
Metres Gained per Game140.4273.0Better
Post-Contact Metres per Game35.6Better20.0
Runs per Game10.5Better8.7
Metres per Run10.10Better8.44
Metres per Hit-Up7.50
Tackles per Game17.518.9Better
Tackle Efficiency86.3Better79.8
Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better0.09Better0.22
Conversion Accuracy
Penalty Goal Accuracy
Errors per Possessionlower is better0.020.02
Kicks per Game1.35.7Better
Kick Metres per Game34.8199.3Better
Games played2215