The verdict
Too close to call
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, the players are level by 0%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
11measures wonEnari Tuala0%of decided measures11measures wonWill Warbrick
Games played: 20 for Enari Tuala, 18 for Will Warbrick. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Enari Tuala |  Will Warbrick |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25 | 0.89Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10Better | 0.06 |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15Better | 0.00 |
| Points per Game | 1.0 | 3.6Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.65Better | 0.61 |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.95 | 3.00Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.40 | 0.78Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.9 | 19.7Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.0Better | 1.6 |
| Run Metres per Game | 139.5Better | 137.9 |
| Metres Gained per Game | 144.0Better | 137.9 |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.3 | 50.4Better |
| Runs per Game | 15.9Better | 14.7 |
| Metres per Run | 8.80 | 9.37Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.49 | 8.65Better |
| Tackles per Game | 13.1Better | 5.4 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 85.3Better | 78.9 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.20 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05Better | 0.09 |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.0 | 1.5Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 10.9 | 18.3Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.3 | 1.6Better |
| Games played | 20 | 18 |