The verdict
Lehi Hopoate has the edge
Across 22 rate and efficiency measures, Lehi Hopoate leads by 64%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
4measures wonEnari Tuala64%of decided measures18measures wonLehi Hopoate
Games played: 20 for Enari Tuala, 23 for Lehi Hopoate. Compared positions: Wing.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Enari Tuala |  Lehi Hopoate |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.25 | 0.83Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.10 | 0.17Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.15 | 0.22Better |
| Points per Game | 1.0 | 3.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.65 | 1.00Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 2.95Better | 2.78 |
| Offloads per Game | 0.40 | 0.74Better |
| Possessions per Game | 18.9 | 23.4Better |
| Passes per Game | 2.0 | 4.9Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 139.5 | 160.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 144.0 | 162.0Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 47.3 | 51.5Better |
| Runs per Game | 15.9 | 16.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.80 | 9.48Better |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 7.49 | 7.98Better |
| Tackles per Game | 13.1Better | 6.1 |
| Tackle Efficiency | 85.3Better | 70.0 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.13Better | 0.29 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.05 | 0.04Better |
| Kick Returns per Game | 1.0 | 2.7Better |
| Kick Return Metres per Game | 10.9 | 27.2Better |
| Bombs Caught per Game | 0.3 | 0.9Better |
| Games played | 20 | 23 |