The verdict
Mitchell Barnett has the edge
Across 19 rate and efficiency measures, Mitchell Barnett leads by 47%. The comparison uses per-game and efficiency performance first, so games played do not overpower a stronger rate.
5measures wonEmre Guler47%of decided measures14measures wonMitchell Barnett
Games played: 19 for Emre Guler, 15 for Mitchell Barnett. Compared positions: Prop.
Side-by-side stats
Each percentage point reflects one decided measure. For example, a 67% advantage means the leader won two-thirds of the measures with enough shared data. The table includes attacking, running, playmaking, defensive and kicking context, while unavailable or small-sample measures are left undecided.
| Metric |  Emre Guler |  Mitchell Barnett |
|---|---|---|
| Tries per Game | 0.05 | 0.07Better |
| Try Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.20Better |
| Line Break Assists per Game | 0.00 | 0.13Better |
| Points per Game | 0.2 | 0.3Better |
| Line Breaks per Game | 0.00 | 0.07Better |
| Tackle Breaks per Game | 0.53 | 1.87Better |
| Offloads per Game | 0.42 | 0.53Better |
| Possessions per Game | 8.3 | 19.5Better |
| Passes per Game | 1.4 | 2.7Better |
| Run Metres per Game | 60.8 | 149.0Better |
| Metres Gained per Game | 60.8 | 149.5Better |
| Post-Contact Metres per Game | 20.1 | 52.7Better |
| Runs per Game | 6.8 | 16.9Better |
| Metres per Run | 8.88Better | 8.83 |
| Metres per Hit-Up | 8.96Better | 8.61 |
| Tackles per Game | 23.8 | 27.3Better |
| Tackle Efficiency | 94.2Better | 90.5 |
| Missed Tackles per Tacklelower is better | 0.04Better | 0.06 |
| Conversion Accuracy | – | – |
| Penalty Goal Accuracy | – | – |
| Errors per Possessionlower is better | 0.00Better | 0.01 |
| Games played | 19 | 15 |